Click here to access resources available at the AICPA. For local resources: click here for Maryland, click  here for Virginia and click here for the District of Columbia.

For small business relief, click here . For federal tax relief, click here and here .

On July 25, 2018, in a statement posted to their firm's respective websites, the leaders of the largest CPA firms reaffirmed the audit profession's commitment to audit quality. 

On July 25, 2018, in a statement posted to their firm's respective websites, the leaders of the largest CPA firms reaffirmed the audit profession's commitment to audit quality. The statement notes, among other things, that the financial statement audit is the bedrock of our financial system. As a firm steeped in putting audit quality at the forefront of everything we do, we join in this commitment. For us, auditing is our passion and a major component to honoring our public-interest responsibilities.

In a 5 to 4 decision, the US Supreme Court overturned the landmark court case that required a physical presence to establish a seller's responsibility to collect and remit sales tax to a state.

In a 5 to 4 decision, the US Supreme Court overturned the landmark court case that required a physical presence to establish a seller's responsibility to collect and remit sales tax to a state. As noted in the respective CCH Special Report, this case, titled South Dakota v. Wayfair, opens the door for states to follow suit in crafting and enacting laws to require remote sellers to collect and remit sales or use tax. This issue warrants close monitoring to see how states address, among other things, retroactive application and the related implications under ASC 450, Contingencies.

On June 21, 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued its latest updated guidance for nonprofit organizations.

On June 21, 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued its latest updated guidance for nonprofit organizations. Click here for a copy of the newsletter and here for a copy of the new standard.

The principal changes involve helping preparers and auditors more consistently 1) characterize grants and similar contracts (primarily with government agencies) as exchange transactions or contributions; and 2) distinguish between conditional and unconditional contributions. 

Ellicott City Main Street has again suffered tragic losses from torrential rain storms. 

Ellicott City Main Street has again suffered tragic losses from torrential rain storms. Click here and here on how you can help.  And click here for a collection of thoughts from business owners on rebuilding (from The Baltimore Sun).

This represents MACPA's Accounting and Auditing Standards Committee's comments on the exposure draft issued by the Auditing Standards Board addressing changes to the auditor reporting model and the auditor's consideration of disclosures in a financial statement audit.

A&A Committee Comment Letter 18.05.14

Welcome to volume 18.02 of our Tax Update newsletter.

Welcome to volume 18.02 of our Tax Update newsletter. Click here to access our newsletter covering highlights of the new tax law from an individual perspective. For a high level comparison of key provisions of the new law with prior law, click here.

Welcome to volume 18.01 of our Tax Update newsletter.

Welcome to volume 18.01 of our Tax Update newsletter. Click here to access our newsletter covering highlights of the new tax law from a business perspective. We welcome comments and suggestions for future editions. Thank you.

By now we are all well aware of the devastation and displacement caused by Hurricanes Harvey and Irma.  The effort to restore and rebuild will be massive and long-enduring.  For our clients and friends, we have put together this article to be a source of information on matters related to helping those affected.  In the coming weeks and months, we will update and revise this resource as needed. 

By now we are all well aware of the devastation and displacement caused by Hurricanes Harvey and Irma.  The effort to restore and rebuild will be massive and long-enduring.  For our clients and friends, we have put together this article to be a source of information on matters related to helping those affected.  In the coming weeks and months, we will update and revise this resource as needed. 

AICPA:

http://www.smartbrief.com/branded/668B730F-E8CE-4A21-BAA9-AC254169B996/7C6EC4CF-DD1D-4987-B647-D45ECDA2B2D8

American Red Cross:

http://www.redcross.org/about-us/our-work/disaster-relief

Insurance Claims Information:

http://www.iii.org/article/insurance-company-claims-filing-telephone-numbers

IRS:

https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-1099r

https://www.irs.gov/individuals/tax-law-provisions-for-disaster-areas

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/tax-relief-for-victims-of-hurricane-irma-in-south-carolina

www.irs.gov/hurricaneharvey

www.irs.gov/hurricaneirma

IRS Gives Tax Relief to Victims of Hurricane Harvey; Parts of Texas Now Eligible; Extension Filers Have Until Jan. 31 to File

Retirement Plans Can Make Loans, Hardship Distributions to Victims of Hurricane Harvey

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/faqs-for-disaster-victims

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p584b.pdf

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-16-53.pdf

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/tax-exempt-organizations-affected-by-hurricanes-harvey-and-irma-granted-tax-relief

Louisiana:

http://gov.louisiana.gov/news/major-disaster-declared-for-the-state-of-louisiana-8-14-16

https://www.ldi.la.gov/

U.S. Government (other than IRS):

https://www.fema.gov/

https://www.disasterassistance.gov/

https://www.dhs.gov/topic/disasters

https://www.sba.gov/loans-grants/see-what-sba-offers/sba-loan-programs/disaster-loans

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2017-164

Texas:

https://texasrelieffund.portal.texas.gov/

https://hhs.texas.gov/about-hhs/communications-events/news/2017/08/hhs-works-approval-emergency-benefits

The proposed ASU is designed to help organizations decide if a transaction should be accounted for as a contribution or as an exchange.

There has been a long standing debate in the financial accounting and reporting community as to the proper treatment of certain government grants.  Specifically, the main issue is should these be treated as contributions or revenue from exchange transactions.  The answer can have a significant effect on an organization's financial statements assuming they following U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.  The proposal aims to provide more guidance around this issue. Also, the proposal provides enhanced guidance around the distinction between conditional versus unconditional contributions. The proposal can be found here.  Comments can be submitted at the FASB's website through November 1.

This article discusses the importance of timing of enrollment.

Medicare Enrollment

This newsletter covers the recent ASU issued on revenue recognition in context of exchange transactions.

FASB In Focus 14.05.28 (updated 16.01)

This newsletter summarizes the new ASU addressing accounting for leasing transctions.

FASB In Focus 14.05.28 (updated 16.01)

This represents our firm's comment on the PEEC exposure draft on proposed interpretations under the Integrity and Objectivity Rule.

PEEC ED Comment Letter 17.06.20

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has announced that the mandatory beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is back in effect. Because reporting companies may need additional time to comply with their BOI reporting obligations, FinCEN is generally extending the deadline 30 calendar days from February 19, 2025, for most companies.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has announced that the mandatory beneficial ownership information (BOI) reporting requirement under the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is back in effect. Because reporting companies may need additional time to comply with their BOI reporting obligations, FinCEN is generally extending the deadline 30 calendar days from February 19, 2025, for most companies.

FinCEN's announcement is based on the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler Division) to stay its prior nationwide injunction order against the reporting requirement (Smith v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, DC Tex., 6:24-cv-00336, Feb. 17, 2025). This district court stayed its prior order, pending appeal, in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent order to stay the nationwide injunction against the reporting requirement that had been ordered by a different federal district court in Texas (McHenry v. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., SCt, No. 24A653, Jan. 23, 2025).

Given this latest district court decision, the regulations implementing the BOI reporting requirements of the CTA are no longer stayed.

Updated Reporting Deadlines

Subject to any applicable court orders, BOI reporting is now mandatory, but FinCEN is providing additional time for companies to report:

• For most reporting companies, the extended deadline to file an initial, updated, and/or corrected BOI report is now March 21, 2025. FinCEN expects to provide an update before that date of any further modification of the deadline, recognizing that reporting companies may need additional time to comply.
• Reporting companies that were previously given a reporting deadline later than March 21, 2025, must file their initial BOI report by that later deadline. For example, if a company’s reporting deadline is in April 2025 because it qualifies for certain disaster relief extensions, it should follow the April deadline, not the March deadline.

Plaintiffs in National Small Business United v. Yellen, DC Ala., No. 5:22-cv-01448, are not required to report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN at this time.

FinCEN Notice FIN-2025-CTA1

The IRS has issued Notice 2025-15, providing guidance on an alternative method for furnishing health coverage statements under Code Secs. 6055 and 6056. This method allows insurers and applicable large employers (ALEs) to comply with their reporting obligations by posting an online notice rather than automatically furnishing statements to individuals.

The IRS has issued Notice 2025-15, providing guidance on an alternative method for furnishing health coverage statements under Code Secs. 6055 and 6056. This method allows insurers and applicable large employers (ALEs) to comply with their reporting obligations by posting an online notice rather than automatically furnishing statements to individuals.

Under Code Sec. 6055, entities providing minimum essential coverage must report coverage details to the IRS and furnish statements to responsible individuals. Similarly, Code Sec. 6056 requires ALEs, generally those with 50 or more full-time employees, to report health insurance information for those employees. The Paperwork Burden Reduction Act amended these sections to introduce an alternative furnishing method, effective for statements related to returns for calendar years after 2023.

Instead of automatically providing statements, reporting entities may post a clear and conspicuous notice on their websites, informing individuals that they may request a copy of their statement. The notice must be posted by the original furnishing deadline, including any automatic 30-day extension, and must remain accessible through October 15 of the following year. If a responsible individual or full-time employee requests a statement, the reporting entity must furnish it within 30 days of the request or by January 31 of the following year, whichever is later.

For statements related to the 2024 calendar year, the notice must be posted by March 3, 2025. Statements may be furnished electronically if permitted under Reg. § 1.6055-2 for minimum essential coverage providers and Reg. § 301.6056-2 for ALEs.

This alternative method applies regardless of whether the individual shared responsibility payment under Code Sec. 5000A is zero. The guidance clarifies that this method applies to statements required under both Code Sec. 6055 and Code Sec. 6056. Reg. § 1.6055-1(g)(4)(ii)(B) sets forth the requirements for the alternative manner of furnishing statements under Code Sec. 6055, while the same framework applies to Code Sec. 6056 with relevant terminology adjustments. Form 1095-B, used for reporting minimum essential coverage, and Form 1095-C, used by ALEs to report health insurance offers, may be provided under this alternative method.

Notice 2025-15

The IRS has issued the luxury car depreciation limits for business vehicles placed in service in 2025 and the lease inclusion amounts for business vehicles first leased in 2025.

The IRS has issued the luxury car depreciation limits for business vehicles placed in service in 2025 and the lease inclusion amounts for business vehicles first leased in 2025.

Luxury Passenger Car Depreciation Caps

The luxury car depreciation caps for a passenger car placed in service in 2025 limit annual depreciation deductions to:

• $12,200 for the first year without bonus depreciation
• $20,200 for the first year with bonus depreciation
• $19,600 for the second year
• $11,800 for the third year
• $7,060 for the fourth through sixth year

Depreciation Caps for SUVs, Trucks and Vans

The luxury car depreciation caps for a sport utility vehicle, truck, or van placed in service in 2025 are:

• $12,200 for the first year without bonus depreciation
• $20,200 for the first year with bonus depreciation
• $19,600 for the second year
• $11,800 for the third year
• $7,060 for the fourth through sixth year

Excess Depreciation on Luxury Vehicles

If depreciation exceeds the annual cap, the excess depreciation is deducted beginning in the year after the vehicle’s regular depreciation period ends.

The annual cap for this excess depreciation is:

• $7,060 for passenger cars and
• $7,060 for SUVS, trucks, and vans.

Lease Inclusion Amounts for Cars, SUVs, Trucks and Vans

If a vehicle is first leased in 2025, a taxpayer must add a lease inclusion amount to gross income in each year of the lease if its fair market value at the time of the lease is more than:

• $62,000 for a passenger car, or
• $62,000 for an SUV, truck or van.

The 2025 lease inclusion tables provide the lease inclusion amounts for each year of the lease.

The lease inclusion amount results in a permanent reduction in the taxpayer’s deduction for the lease payments.

Rev. Proc. 2025-16

The leadership of the Senate Finance Committee have issued a discussion draft of bipartisan legislative proposals to make administrative and procedural improvements to the Internal Revenue Service.

A limited liability company (LLC) classified as a TEFRA partnership could not claim a charitable contribution deduction for a conservation easement because the easement deed failed to comply with the perpetuity requirements under Code Sec. 170(h)(5)(A) and Reg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6). The Tax Court determined that the language of the deed did not satisfy statutory requirements, rendering the claimed deduction invalid.

A limited liability company (LLC) classified as a TEFRA partnership could not claim a charitable contribution deduction for a conservation easement because the easement deed failed to comply with the perpetuity requirements under Code Sec. 170(h)(5)(A) and Reg. § 1.170A-14(g)(6). The Tax Court determined that the language of the deed did not satisfy statutory requirements, rendering the claimed deduction invalid.

Easement Valuation

The taxpayer asserted that the highest and best use of the property was as a commercial mining site, supporting a valuation significantly higher than its purchase price. However, the Court concluded that the record did not support this assertion. The Court found that the proposed mining use was not financially feasible or maximally productive. The IRS’s expert relied on comparable sales data, while the taxpayer’s valuation method was based on a discounted cash-flow analysis, which the Court found speculative and not supported by market data.

Penalties

The taxpayer contended that the IRS did not comply with supervisory approval process under Code Sec. 6751(b) prior to imposing penalties. However, the Court found that the concerned IRS revenue agent duly obtained prior supervisory approval and the IRS satisfied the procedural requirements under Code Sec. 6751(b). Because the valuation of the easement reported on the taxpayer’s return exceeded 200 percent of the Court-determined value, the misstatement was deemed "gross" under Code Sec. 6662(h)(2)(A)(i). Accordingly, the Court upheld accuracy-related penalties under Code Sec. 6662 for gross valuation misstatement, substantial understatement, and negligence.

Green Valley Investors, LLC, TC Memo. 2025-15, Dec. 62,617(M)

The Tax Court ruled that IRS Appeals Officers and Team Managers were not "Officers of the United States." Therefore, they did not need to be appointed under the Appointments Clause.

The Tax Court ruled that IRS Appeals Officers and Team Managers were not "Officers of the United States." Therefore, they did not need to be appointed under the Appointments Clause.

The taxpayer filed income taxes for tax years 2012 (TY) through TY 2017, but he did not pay tax. During a Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing, the taxpayer raised constitutional arguments that IRS Appeals and associated employees serve in violation of the Appointments Clause and the constitutional separation of powers.

No Significant Authority

The court noted that IRS Appeals officers do not wield significant authority. For instance, the officers do not have authority to examine witnesses, unlike Tax Court Special Trial Judges (STJs) and SEC Administrative Law Judges (ALJs). The Appeals officers also lack the power to issue, serve, and enforce summonses through the IRS’s general power to examine books and witnesses.

The court found no reason to deviate from earlier judgments in Tucker v. Commissioner (Tucker I), 135 T.C. 114, Dec. 58,279); and Tucker v. Commissioner (Tucker II), CA-DC, 676 F.3d 1129, 2012-1 ustc ¶50,312). Both judgments emphasized the court’s observations in the current case. In Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (per curiam), the Supreme Court similarly held that Federal Election Commission (FEC) commissioners were not appointed in accordance with the Appointments Clause, and thus none of them were permitted to exercise "significant authority."

The taxpayer lacked standing to challenge the appointment of the IRS Appeals Chief, and said officers under the Appointments Clause, and the removal of the Chief under the separation of powers doctrine.

IRC Chief of Appeals

The taxpayer failed to prove that the Chief’s tenure affected his hearing and prejudiced him in some way, under standards in United States v. Smith, 962 F.3d 755 (4th Cir. 2020) and United States v. Castillo, 772 F. App’x 11 (3d Cir. 2019). The Chief did not participate in the taxpayer's CDP hearing, and so the Chief did not injure the taxpayer. The taxpayer's injury was not fairly traceable to the appointment (or lack thereof) of the Chief, and the Chief was too distant from the case for any court order pointed to him to redress the taxpayer's harm.

C.C. Tooke III, 164 TC No. 2, Dec. 62,610

A new year may find a number of individuals with the pressing urge to take stock, clean house and become a bit more organized. With such a desire to declutter, a taxpayer may want to undergo a housecleaning of documents, receipts and papers that he or she may have stored over the years in the event of an IRS audit. Year to year, fears of an audit for claims for tax deductions, allowances and credits may have led to the accumulation of a number of tax related documents—many of which may no longer need to be kept.

A new year may find a number of individuals with the pressing urge to take stock, clean house and become a bit more organized. With such a desire to declutter, a taxpayer may want to undergo a housecleaning of documents, receipts and papers that he or she may have stored over the years in the event of an IRS audit. Year to year, fears of an audit for claims for tax deductions, allowances and credits may have led to the accumulation of a number of tax related documents—many of which may no longer need to be kept.

However, it is of extreme importance for tax records to support the income, deductions and credits claimed on returns. Therefore, taxpayers must keep such records in the event the IRS inquires about a return or amended return.

Return-related documents

Generally, the IRS recommended that a taxpayer keep copies of tax returns and supporting documents at least three years. However, the IRS noted, there are some documents that should be kept for up to seven years, for those instances where a taxpayer needs to file an amended return or if questions may arise. As a rule of thumb, taxpayers should keep real estate related records for up to seven years following the disposition of property.

Health care related documents

Although health care information statements should be kept with other tax records, taxpayers are to remember that such statements do not need to be sent to the IRS as proof of health coverage. Records that taxpayers are strongly encouraged to keep include records of employer-provided coverage, premiums paid, advance payments of the premium tax credit received and the type of coverage held. As with other tax records, the IRS recommended that taxpayers keep such information for three years from the time of filing the associated tax return.

Last year’s return

Taxpayers are encouraged to keep a copy of last year’s return. The IRS, in efforts to thwart tax related identity theft and refund fraud, continues to make changes to authenticate and protect taxpayer identity in online return-related interactions. Beginning in 2017, some taxpayers who e-file will need to enter either the prior-year adjusted gross income or the prior-year self-select PIN and date of birth—information associated with the prior year’s return—to authenticate their identity.

IRS Chief Counsel recently examined the tax treatment of crowdfunding activities in a new information letter (Information Letter 2016-36). Crowdfunding is a relatively recent phenomenon, used by an individual or entity to raise funds through small individual contributions from a large number of people. The guidance notes that the income tax consequences to a taxpayer of a crowdfunding effort depend on all the facts and circumstances surrounding that effort.

IRS Chief Counsel recently examined the tax treatment of crowdfunding activities in a new information letter (Information Letter 2016-36). Crowdfunding is a relatively recent phenomenon, used by an individual or entity to raise funds through small individual contributions from a large number of people. The guidance notes that the income tax consequences to a taxpayer of a crowdfunding effort depend on all the facts and circumstances surrounding that effort.

In general, Chief Counsel determined, crowdfunding revenues are included in the recipient’s gross income. Code Sec. 61(a) generally provides that gross income includes all income from whatever source derived. However, there are some benefits that a taxpayer receives that are excluded from income because they do not meet the definition of gross income or because a specific exclusion exists.

Chief Counsel observed that money received without an offsetting liability, such as a repayment obligation, that is neither a capital contribution to an entity in exchange for a capital interest in the entity, nor a gift, is included in income. The facts and circumstance surrounding the receipt of crowdfunding revenue must be considered to determine it is income.

Chief Counsel concluded that crowdfunding revenues generally are included in income if they are not (1) loans that must be repaid; (2) capital contributed to an entity in exchange for an equity interest in the entity; or (3) gifts made out of detached generosity and without any “quid pro quo.” Crowdfunding revenues also must generally be included in income to the extent they are received for services rendered or are gains from the sale of property.

Chief Counsel also examined constructive receipt rules in relation to crowdfunding. Income, although not actually reduced to a taxpayer’s possession, is constructively received in the tax year during which it is credited to the taxpayer’s account, set apart for the taxpayer, or otherwise made available. Further, although income is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of the income is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions, a self-imposed restriction on the availability of income does not legally defer recognition of that income, Chief Counsel noted.

These are only the specific issues that Chief Counsel addressed in Information Letter 2016-36. As the crowdfunding space develops, more guidance is likely to follow.

Employers and other organizations must obtain an employer identification number (EIN) to identify themselves for tax administration purposes, such as starting a new business, withholding taxes on wages, or creating a trust. Entities apply for an EIN by filing IRS Form SS-4. Page two of the form advises whether an applicant needs an EIN.

Employers and other organizations must obtain an employer identification number (EIN) to identify themselves for tax administration purposes, such as starting a new business, withholding taxes on wages, or creating a trust. Entities apply for an EIN by filing IRS Form SS-4. Page two of the form advises whether an applicant needs an EIN.

Other entities that need an EIN include corporations, partnerships, estates, trusts, state or local governments, and churches and other nonprofit organizations. Unincorporated entities (sole proprietorships) that establish a retirement plan or that file certain tax forms will also need an EIN for filing the relevant forms.

Application process

The IRS does not charge for obtaining an EIN and has sought to simplify the application process. Taxpayers may apply by mail, by fax, or online. International applicants may also apply by phone. In all cases, if the IRS determines that the applicant needs an EIN, the IRS will issue the EIN and transmit it to the taxpayer in the same manner as the application was made.

Applications by mail generally take four weeks, the IRS indicates, once the SS-4 is properly and completely filled out. Entities located in the U.S. or a U.S. territory can apply online. For online applications, the IRS validates the information and issues the EIN immediately. The IRS notes that the principal officer or other relevant party must have a valid taxpayer identification number, such as a Social Security Number, to use the online application process. The IRS will respond to a completed fax application within four business days, if the applicant provides a fax number.

Filing without EIN

The IRS states that it will only issue one EIN per day per responsible party, regardless of the means of applying. If the taxpayer needs to file a return but lacks an EIN because of this limitation, the IRS advises that the taxpayer should attach a completed Form SS-4 to the completed and signed tax return. The IRS will assign an EIN and then process the return.